Welfare reform is not an earnestly solicitous conscious priority for most gay the bulk of mankind I know.

Welfare reform is not an earnestly solicitous conscious priority for most gay the bulk of mankind I know. Nor has it been a priority for the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender political motion This is a huge mistake. Propos changes to the 1996 welfare reform law will dramatically damage GLBT families. The 1996 welfare reform law changed the way federal policy was escorted by giving more authority to state restraints through block grants. But its ideological parents lay deep within the antigay, racially bigoted far right.

The law's laudable focus was to help poor persons get off welfare rolls and into piece of works But two critical features of the law were the explicit promotion of two-parent, heterosexual families and an effort to shape out-of-wedlock births. Taken at face value, these goals may not be seen objectionable. But gay people must take note that these measures create an environment hostile to same-sex families. We lack the right to marry, same-sex unions and domestic-partnership policies are subject to attack, restrictions on gay and lesbian adoption exist in four states, and 35 so-called state defense of marriage acts and a federal law have been enacted.

President Bush's of recent origin welfare proposals are even more homophobic and sexist. Conservatives want to dispose of hundreds of millions a year to exalt heterosexual marriage while denying any recognition to gay families. They follow to prevent unmarried people from adopting and stop single population from having kids.

The of the present day proposals are backed by powerful Bush administration appointees like Wade Horn at the Department of Health and Human Services, muscular think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institution, and networks of self-appointed intellectuals like the blandly named Institute for American Values. This so-called marriage emotion even held a national meeting to release its homophobic modern report, "Why Marriage Matters," forward February 14, two days after GLBT marriage activists held National Freedom to Marry Day.

sum of two units things astonish me about this mental action and this moment. The first is the total acquiescence of the liberal and centrist establishment to this profoundly reactionary agenda, and the inferior is the nearly complete absence of any GLBT voice in these debates. There is clearly a link between the two

The liberal-right consensus that is Washington simply avoids that with which it is uneasy. GLBT family are not present in any of the research cited as justification for the recent policies favoring marriage and frowning onward out-of-wedlock births. Searching the Web sites of major liberal think tanks yields little, if any, data upon GLBT people. This is intolerable, and we should be agitating, pushing each liberal organization, every libertarian with an interpret mind, every conservative with a conscience not avowed by a corporation to demand that they include GLBT the bulk of mankind in their field of vision.

This silence is made more shameful from our own lack of action. We are marginalized just as a great quantity [i]or[/i] amount of by our class and race biases as we are according to their homophobia. Only one national GLBT organization works upon welfare reform. Just a handful of community-based collections have even taken positions that champion GLBT persons in this debate. This personal and political avoidance of lack issues is nearsighted and unconscionable. Nationwide the statistics are dramatic: In novel York City alone, 68% of the bulk of mankind with HIV and AIDS realize their health care from Medicaid (a welfare program), and a majority of these are gay men Gay seniors contest to survive on fixed incomes without the benefit of family support networks. For decades community-based social service organizations--youth clusters housing programs, health clinics--have told us that GLBT communities harbor many the public who are in urgent financial need

privation is a GLBT reality, and its alleviation is a matter of justice. Our silence will not defend us, as poet Audre Lorde one time reminded us. Neither will our class.

...

Home